Initial commit - combined iTerm2 scripts
Contains: - 1m-brag - tem - VaultMesh_Catalog_v1 - VAULTMESH-ETERNAL-PATTERN 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vault Sovereign
286
1m-brag/VaultMesh-Demo-Script.md
Normal file
286
1m-brag/VaultMesh-Demo-Script.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
|
||||
# VAULTMESH COMMAND CENTER
|
||||
## Live Demonstration Script
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration**: 20-30 minutes
|
||||
**Audience**: Executives, CISOs, Technical Decision-Makers
|
||||
**Format**: Screen share + narration
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## PRE-DEMO SETUP
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Check
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Verify all services running
|
||||
curl -s http://localhost:8080/health | jq
|
||||
# Expected: {"status":"ok","proofs":N,"nodes":N,...}
|
||||
|
||||
# Start Command Center UI (if not running)
|
||||
cd ~/vaultmesh/console && npm start
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify tmux session
|
||||
tmux attach -t sovereign || tmux new -s sovereign
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Browser Tabs (pre-open)
|
||||
1. **IoTek.nexus Console** - Primary demo interface
|
||||
2. **Grafana Dashboard** - Metrics visualization
|
||||
3. **Terminal** - Live commands (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## DEMO SCRIPT
|
||||
|
||||
### OPENING (2 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Display: Console landing screen with VaultMesh banner]*
|
||||
|
||||
"What you're seeing is not a security dashboard. It's not a SIEM. It's not another monitoring tool.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a **Command Center**—a unified interface for operating sovereign digital infrastructure. Every action you'll see generates cryptographic proof. Every threat detection triggers automatic learning. Every event becomes part of an immutable record.
|
||||
|
||||
Let me show you what that means in practice."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### SECTION 1: SYSTEM STATUS (3 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `status`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"Let's start with a full system overview."
|
||||
|
||||
**Walk through the output:**
|
||||
- "Shield status shows our continuous monitoring state—currently armed and watching"
|
||||
- "Proof shows we have [N] cryptographic receipts generated—each one independently verifiable"
|
||||
- "Mesh shows [N] nodes connected via zero-trust network"
|
||||
- "TEM—our Threat Transmutation Engine—has generated [N] defensive rules from past threats"
|
||||
- "Lawchain confirms we're in compliance with our constitutional governance rules"
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Point to Merkle Root]*
|
||||
|
||||
"This string—the Merkle Root—is the cryptographic summary of every event in our system. It's updated with each new proof. Anyone with this root can verify the integrity of our entire audit trail."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### SECTION 2: PROOFCHAIN IN ACTION (5 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `proof latest`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"This is our Proofchain—the cryptographic memory of the system."
|
||||
|
||||
**Walk through:**
|
||||
- "Each receipt represents a significant event: a deployment, a security finding, a governance decision"
|
||||
- "The hash is BLAKE2b—quantum-resistant, faster than SHA-256, just as secure"
|
||||
- "We anchor these to external authorities—RFC-3161 timestamps and blockchain—so the proofs remain valid even if our system were compromised"
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `proof generate demo.executive_briefing`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"Let me generate a proof right now for this demonstration."
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Show output]*
|
||||
|
||||
"The system has:
|
||||
1. Created a cryptographic receipt for this event
|
||||
2. Updated our Merkle tree
|
||||
3. Logged it for blockchain anchoring
|
||||
|
||||
This took milliseconds. Every significant action in your infrastructure can work this way."
|
||||
|
||||
**Key message:**
|
||||
"When a regulator, auditor, or legal proceeding asks 'what happened?'—you don't produce logs that could have been altered. You produce mathematical proof that cannot be forged."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### SECTION 3: SHIELD MONITORING (4 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `shield status`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"Shield is our continuous monitoring layer."
|
||||
|
||||
**Walk through findings:**
|
||||
- "We categorize by severity: Critical, High, Medium, Low"
|
||||
- "Each finding is automatically fed to TEM for learning"
|
||||
- "Notice the 'Last Scan' timestamp—this runs continuously, not on schedule"
|
||||
|
||||
> *[If there are findings, discuss one briefly]*
|
||||
|
||||
"This finding, for example—[describe]—has already been processed by TEM. Let me show you what that means."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### SECTION 4: THREAT TRANSMUTATION (6 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `tem status`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"This is where we differentiate from every other security approach.
|
||||
|
||||
Most security systems try to block threats. We **transmute** them.
|
||||
|
||||
TEM—the Threat Transmutation Engine—takes every attack, every vulnerability, every anomaly, and converts it into defensive improvement."
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `tem rules`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"These are rules generated automatically from detected threats:
|
||||
- Sigma rules for SIEM integration
|
||||
- YARA rules for file analysis
|
||||
- Network rules for traffic filtering
|
||||
- Pattern signatures for future detection
|
||||
|
||||
Each rule traces back to a specific transmutation—we know exactly which threat taught us this lesson."
|
||||
|
||||
> *[If time permits, demonstrate manual transmutation]*
|
||||
|
||||
"Let me transmute a threat manually so you can see the process."
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `tem transmute CVE-2024-DEMO high`]*
|
||||
|
||||
**Walk through phases:**
|
||||
- "NIGREDO: Ingesting the raw threat material"
|
||||
- "ALBEDO: Extracting patterns and signatures"
|
||||
- "CITRINITAS: Generating defensive rules"
|
||||
- "RUBEDO: Integration complete—system is now hardened"
|
||||
|
||||
**Key message:**
|
||||
"Traditional security is a cost center—you spend money hoping nothing happens. VaultMesh turns security into an investment—every attack makes you stronger."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### SECTION 5: MESH INFRASTRUCTURE (3 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `mesh status`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"All of this runs on zero-trust infrastructure."
|
||||
|
||||
**Walk through:**
|
||||
- "Tailscale mesh—every connection is encrypted end-to-end"
|
||||
- "No central VPN—nodes communicate directly"
|
||||
- "Each node is shown with its online status"
|
||||
|
||||
"This architecture means:
|
||||
- No single point of failure
|
||||
- No external service dependencies
|
||||
- Complete data sovereignty—your data never leaves your infrastructure"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### SECTION 6: BRAID SYSTEM (2 minutes, if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Type command: `braid list`]*
|
||||
|
||||
"Braid extends trust across organizational boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
If you have partners, subsidiaries, or cooperating organizations—each running VaultMesh—you can verify their proofs without trusting their systems.
|
||||
|
||||
Think of it as cryptographic attestation: 'I can prove this event occurred in their system without having access to their system.'"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### CLOSING (3 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Return to status view]*
|
||||
|
||||
"Let me summarize what we've seen:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Complete visibility** across your digital infrastructure
|
||||
2. **Cryptographic proof** of every significant event
|
||||
3. **Autonomous learning** that converts threats into defenses
|
||||
4. **Zero-trust architecture** with full data sovereignty
|
||||
5. **Immutable audit trail** that satisfies any regulator
|
||||
|
||||
This isn't software you install and forget. It requires an operator—someone who understands the system and your organization. That's what the Sovereign Intelligence Operator engagement provides.
|
||||
|
||||
You get the infrastructure, the expertise, and the continuous operation—as a unified capability."
|
||||
|
||||
> *[Pause]*
|
||||
|
||||
"What questions do you have about what you've seen?"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## COMMON QUESTIONS & RESPONSES
|
||||
|
||||
### "How does this compare to [existing SIEM/MDR/etc.]?"
|
||||
|
||||
"Traditional security tools are reactive—they detect and alert. VaultMesh is generative—it creates proof and learns from every event. They're complementary, but VaultMesh adds a layer that doesn't exist in conventional approaches."
|
||||
|
||||
### "What's the deployment footprint?"
|
||||
|
||||
"VaultMesh is self-hosted on your infrastructure. Typical deployment is a small Kubernetes cluster or a few dedicated VMs. No cloud dependencies, no external data flow."
|
||||
|
||||
### "How do you handle false positives?"
|
||||
|
||||
"TEM's learning is supervised initially—we review generated rules before deployment. Over time, confidence scores improve and more automation is possible. The goal is augmented intelligence, not replacement of human judgment."
|
||||
|
||||
### "What about regulatory compliance?"
|
||||
|
||||
"Proofchain is designed for compliance. Every receipt maps to control frameworks (NIS2, GDPR, DORA). We generate audit-ready reports automatically. The cryptographic anchoring provides evidence that satisfies even aggressive regulatory requirements."
|
||||
|
||||
### "What happens if VaultMesh is compromised?"
|
||||
|
||||
"Our proofs are anchored externally—to RFC-3161 timestamp authorities and public blockchains. Even if someone gained full control of VaultMesh, they couldn't forge historical proofs. The external anchors would reveal any tampering."
|
||||
|
||||
### "What's the pricing?"
|
||||
|
||||
"Engagement starts at €250,000/year for Tier Albedo, scaling to €1,000,000/year for full Tier Rubedo service with 24/7 coverage and on-site presence. It's not a software license—it's a capability you acquire."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## POST-DEMO MATERIALS
|
||||
|
||||
**Send within 24 hours:**
|
||||
1. Sovereign Operator Services Deck (PDF)
|
||||
2. One-page capability summary
|
||||
3. Proposed next steps (Discovery call, NDA, Technical deep-dive)
|
||||
|
||||
**Offer:**
|
||||
"I can provide a technical deep-dive for your security team, or we can proceed directly to a discovery session to scope a proposal for your specific environment."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNICAL NOTES FOR OPERATOR
|
||||
|
||||
### If Something Goes Wrong
|
||||
|
||||
**Console not responding:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Check backend
|
||||
curl http://localhost:8080/health
|
||||
|
||||
# Restart if needed
|
||||
cd ~/vaultmesh && uvicorn offsec_mcp_live:app --port 8080 &
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**No recent proofs:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Generate a proof before demo
|
||||
curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/mcp/command \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
||||
-d '{"session_id":"demo","user":"sovereign","command":"proof generate demo.setup"}'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**TEM showing zero rules:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Create a test transmutation
|
||||
python3 -c "from tem import TemEngine; t=TemEngine(); t.transmute({'id':'demo-threat','severity':'medium','description':'Demo threat'})"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Impressive Sequences
|
||||
|
||||
**For technical audiences:**
|
||||
- Show the raw Merkle tree calculation
|
||||
- Demonstrate blockchain anchoring verification
|
||||
- Deep-dive into TEM pattern extraction
|
||||
|
||||
**For executive audiences:**
|
||||
- Focus on risk reduction narrative
|
||||
- Emphasize regulatory compliance
|
||||
- Highlight cost of breaches vs. cost of sovereignty
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Document Version: 1.0*
|
||||
*Last Updated: [DATE]*
|
||||
|
||||
⚗
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user