Initial commit - combined iTerm2 scripts
Contains: - 1m-brag - tem - VaultMesh_Catalog_v1 - VAULTMESH-ETERNAL-PATTERN 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
72
VaultMesh_Catalog_v1/pages/page6-lawchain.md
Normal file
72
VaultMesh_Catalog_v1/pages/page6-lawchain.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
Page Title: Lawchain Compliance Ledger
|
||||
Summary: Lawchain is the compliance-focused ledger that tracks regulatory obligations, oracle answers, and audit trails via receipts. It integrates with the proof system to ensure every compliance answer has a cryptographic backbone, and it is designed to speak the language of EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2, and future frameworks.
|
||||
|
||||
Key Findings:
|
||||
- Oracle answers are validated against a schema before being recorded.
|
||||
- Each answer is hashed and bound into a receipt, linking legal semantics to proofs.
|
||||
- Federation metrics allow multi-node Lawchain sync across the mesh.
|
||||
- Policy evaluation is driven by JSON inputs and produces JSON results for downstream tools.
|
||||
|
||||
Components:
|
||||
- Lawchain Core Ledger (append-only compliance scroll).
|
||||
- Oracle Answer Validator (schema enforcement).
|
||||
- Compliance Scroll store (receipt logs).
|
||||
- Federation Metrics emitter.
|
||||
- Policy Evaluator (rule engine).
|
||||
|
||||
Oracle Answer Schema (vm_oracle_answer_v1):
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"question": "string",
|
||||
"answer_text": "string",
|
||||
"citations": [{
|
||||
"document_id": "string",
|
||||
"framework": "string",
|
||||
"excerpt": "string"
|
||||
}],
|
||||
"compliance_flags": {
|
||||
"gdpr_relevant": true,
|
||||
"ai_act_relevant": false,
|
||||
"nis2_relevant": true
|
||||
},
|
||||
"gaps": ["string"],
|
||||
"insufficient_context": false,
|
||||
"confidence": "high"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Workflows / Pipelines:
|
||||
- Compliance Q&A:
|
||||
1. Operator (or system) asks Lawchain a question.
|
||||
2. RAG/Retrieve context from policy docs and regulations.
|
||||
3. LLM generates an answer draft.
|
||||
4. Answer is validated against vm_oracle_answer_v1 schema.
|
||||
5. Hash (Blake3 over canonical JSON) computed and receipt generated.
|
||||
6. Receipt anchored via proof system and stored in Lawchain.
|
||||
|
||||
Metrics Files (examples under /tmp/):
|
||||
| File | Purpose |
|
||||
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|
||||
| lawchain_federate.out | Federation sync output |
|
||||
| lawchain_federate.err | Federation errors |
|
||||
| lawchain_metrics.out | Metrics/logging output |
|
||||
| policy_eval_out.json | Policy evaluation results |
|
||||
| policy_input.json | Policy evaluation input |
|
||||
|
||||
Security Notes:
|
||||
- Answer hash computed as blake3(json.dumps(answer, sort_keys=True)).
|
||||
- Receipts bind answer content, timestamps, and possibly node identity.
|
||||
- gaps and insufficient_context prevent fake certainty in legal answers.
|
||||
- Citations must reference real sources, enabling audit of answer provenance.
|
||||
|
||||
Compliance Frameworks Tracked:
|
||||
- GDPR – data protection and subject rights.
|
||||
- EU AI Act – risk classification, obligations, and logs.
|
||||
- NIS2 – network and information security.
|
||||
- Custom extensions can map additional frameworks (e.g., SOC2, ISO 27001).
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
- Lawchain service.
|
||||
- Oracle corpus indexed (policies, regulations, internal docs).
|
||||
- Blake3 and JSON schema validator.
|
||||
- Integration with VaultMesh proof spine for receipts and anchoring.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user